MOHAMMAD RAMZAN RATHER AND ORS v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (REVENUE) AND ORS
WP(C)/2136/2025 · 2025-09-02
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8894 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8894 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
ITEM NO. 81
Supplementary List.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
…….
WP (C ) No. 2136/2025 CM No. 5652/2025.
MOHAMMAD RAMZAN RATHER AND ORS (Sr. Citizen). …Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. S.A. Makroo, Sr Advocate with
Mr. Irfan Rasool, Advocate.
Mr. Rahil Noor, Advocate.
VERSUS
UT of JK AND ORS. …Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Bikram deep Singh, Dy. AG
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 02.09.2025
After arguing for a while, the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners submits that he would feel satisfied if the present petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to take a decision on the application stated to have been filed by the petitioner on 31st March, 2023 (Annexure V), regarding allotment of land in terms of the applicable policy, rules, and regulations, within a reasonable period of time. On being asked, Mr. Bikram Deep Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, submits that he has no objection, provided such direction is confined strictly to consideration under the rules and in accordance with law.
In view of the consensus between the learned counsel for the parties, the petition is taken up for disposal at the threshold by directing respondent No. 3 to take a decision on the petitioners’ aforesaid representation, strictly in accordance with law and the governing rules/policy, within a period of four weeks from the date a copy of this order along copy of the petition and annexures are made available to him.
Disposed of accordingly.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge SRINAGAR
02.09.2025. Showkat Khan