933 cp 89 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 89 OF 2012 IN WP/2162/2010 Pravin Arjunrao Sangvikar And Another VERSUS Dr. Dipti Pradeep Dongaonkar ... • Mr. T. M. Venjane Tukaram M., Advocate for the Petitioners • Mr. K. S. Patil, AGP for Respondent – State ... CORAM : N. B. SURYAWANSHI & SMT. VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 10, 2025 O R D E R : 1. By filing affidavit-in-reply respondent has claimed that order is complied with. In view of the compliance of the order, contempt petition stands disposed of. 2. Learned advocate for the petitioners submits that petitioners have placed on record the proof of their attendance in the writ petition. However, the same is ignored by the respondent while making payment to the petitioners. If petitioners have any grievance, it can be agitated by filing appropriate legal proceedings. Petitioners are permitted to withdraw amount of Rs.10,000/- deposited by the respondent along with accrued interest. (SMT. VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, J.) (N. B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) komal kamble Page|1 2025:BHC-AUG:24380-DB