Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88937 (KAR)

SMT MUNIYAMMA v. SRI MUNIYAPPA

WP/18825/2024 · 2025-12-09

Pradeep Singh Yerur

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52137 WP No. 18825 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 18825 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MUNIYAMMA W/O. LATE MARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.16/32 DHARMARAYA ROAD MARUTHI NAGARA, YELHANKA BANGALORE NORTH TALUK. 2. SRI RAJAPPA S/O. LATE MARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDING AT No.16/32 DHARMARAYA ROAD MARUTHI NAGARA, YELHANKA BANGALORE NORTH TALUK. 3. SMT. PILLAMMA D/O. LATE GULLAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS RESIDING AT OPP. G.H.P.S. BEHIND PIZZA RAMAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE BANGALORE - 560 066. 4. SMT. RAJAMMA D/O. LATE GULLAPPA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS RESIDING AT RAJABHAVAI ROAD YELHANKA, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK. REPRSENTED BY THEIR SPA HOLDER SRI SRINIVAS Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52137 WP No. 18825 of 2024 S/O. LATE MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS RESIDING AT CHIKKANEKKUNDI LAYOUT NEAR SHAKTHI EDUCATON TRUST SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI MURALIDHARAN D., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI MUNIYAPPA S/O. LATE GULLAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. 2. SRI KRISHNAPPA S/O. LATE GULLAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS. 3. SMT. RADHAMMA D/O. LATE GULLAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS. 4. SMT. MUNIYAMMA D/O. LATE GULLAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. 5. SMT. MANGAMMA D/O. LATE GULLAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.16/32 DHARMARAYA ROAD, MARUTHI NAGARA YELHANKA, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK. 6. SRI N. DEVARAJAIAH S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS RESIDING AT HOSA BEEDHI YELHANKA, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BANGALORE - 560 064. …RESPONDENTS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52137 WP No. 18825 of 2024 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONERS DATED AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL ORDER There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners when the matter is called-out today. 2. The order dated 09.10.2025 reads as under: "A week's time is granted to rectify the office objections, failing which, list this matter for dismissal." 3. Therefore, it appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting this petition. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE CPN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1