Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8893 (RAJ)

ROSHAN S/O FAJRA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2945/2025 · 2025-03-03

Praveer Bhatnagar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:9068] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2945/2025 Roshan S/o Fajra, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Village Khalluka, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 03/03/2025 1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.41/2022, registered at Police Station Pahari, District Bharatpur for the offence(s) under Sections 143, 323, 341, 379, 452, 427, 354 and 336 of IPC, the petitioner has preferred this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been involved in this case. The allegations containing in the FIR against the petitioner are omnibus in nature. The complainant has lodged the FIR against the 41 persons. The accused-petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation. Apart from the offence under Section 452 of IPC other offences levelled in the FIR are bailable one. The custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required, therefore, the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. [2025:RJ-JP:9068] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2945/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the anticipatory bail application. 4. Considering the fact that the allegations against the petitioner are omnibus in nature. The offences under Sections 143, 323, 341, 427 and 336 of IPC are bailable one. The accused- petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation, without commenting anything on the merits of the case and considering the above facts, I deem it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. is allowed. It is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner- Roshan S/o Fajra, in connection with FIR No.41/2022, registered at Police Station Pahari, District Bharatpur, he shall be enlarged on bail he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /40