- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36123 WP No. 1472 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 1472 OF 2025 (LB- BMP) BETWEEN: SRI. CHANDRU. R S/O LATE T. RAMU AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT NO.32, 2ND MAIN ROAD SEEGEHALLI, K.R.PURA, BANGALORE - 560 049 …PETITIONER (BY SRI.SRIDHAR B.R., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. M SHIVAPRAKASH.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGAR PALIKE (BBMP) HUDSON CIRCLE, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE EXEUTIVE ENGINEER MAHADEVAPURA RANGE, (BBMP) K.R. PURAM SUB DIVISION, BANGALORE - 560 036 3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, K.R.PURAM SUB DIVISION, BANGALORE-560036. Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36123 WP No. 1472 of 2025 4. SMT. RITA LURDHUNATHAN W/O LURDHUNATHAN AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/AT NO.1, MAIN ROAD, SEEGEHALLI, R.T. JAGANNATH LAYOUT, BANGALORE- 560 049 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.BATHEGOWDA K.V., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO 3; SRI.HARSHA., ADVOCATE FOR R4;) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS IN RESPECT OF PROPERTY BEARING KATHA NO.125/90/30/IA, WARD NO.88, 6TH CROSS, BASAVANAPURA, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER On the ground that respondent No.4 has put up illegal construction on the property, the present writ petition is filed by the petitioner with a prayer to direct respondent Nos.1 to 3-Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36123 WP No. 1472 of 2025 Palike (for short, 'the BBMP') to initiate appropriate action against respondent No.4. 2. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3, upon instructions, submits that the BBMP has already initiated appropriate action against the construction put up by respondent No.4. His submission is placed on record. 3. For the aforementioned reasons, the Writ Petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos.1 to 3 to conclude the action initiated against the construction put up by respondent No.4 in the manner known to law after giving a due opportunity of hearing to both the petitioner as well as respondent No.4. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE CH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39