Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88923 (KAR)

KARNATAKA EMPLOYERS ASSOCIATION v. UNION OF INDIA

WP/10358/2021 · 2025-12-08

Jyoti M

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51704 WP No. 10358 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO.10358 OF 2021 (L-PF) BETWEEN: 1. KARNATAKA EMPLOYERS' ASSOCIATION NO.74, 2ND FLOOR, SHANKARA ARCADE VANIVILAS ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU - 560 004, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY K.G.NAGENDRA PRASAD 2. M/S QUESS CROP. LTD., QUESS HOUSE 3/3/2, BELLANDUR GATE, SARJAPURA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 103. REPRESENTED BY ITS MADHU DAMODHARAN GROUP HEAD-LEGAL 3. SRI. P.C.RAO, S/O. LATE SRI. P.SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT MANTRI GREENS, A-1004, MALLESWARAM, BENGALURU - 560 000 MANAGING DIRECTOR RAO IDEAL SERVICE PVT. LTD., PARTNER IDEAL SOLUTIONS …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VASUKI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. B.C.PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51704 WP No. 10358 of 2021 AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT SHRAM SHAKTI BHAWAN, RAFI MARG, NEW DELHI - 110 001. 2. THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, REPRESENTED BY THE CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER HEAD OFFICE BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAWAN, 14-BHIKAJI CAMA PLACE, NEW DELHI - 110 066. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NANDITA D HALDIPUR., ADVOCATE FOR R2; R1 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Vasuki, counsel for the petitioner and Smt.Nandita Haldipur, counsel for respondent No.2 appeared through video conferencing. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51704 WP No. 10358 of 2021 2. Sri.Vasuki, counsel submits that aggrieved by the order dated 01.06.2021, the petitioners have filed the captioned writ petition. He submits that the order has spent by itself as of today. Hence, nothing survives for consideration in the present petition and it may be disposed of. 3. When queried, counsel submits that a conscious decision is taken about the matter having become infructuous. 4. The oral submission is placed on record. 5. The writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21