SURENDRA KUMAR JAIN S/O LATE SHRI TEJBAHADUR SINGH v. RAJASTHAN SARKAR
CCP/214/2025 · 2025-05-14
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, Mukesh Rajpurohit
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8892 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8892 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:20343-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D. B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 214/2025 In S. B. Criminal Misc. (Petition) No. 1484/2023 Surendra Kumar Jain S/o Late Shri Tejbahadur Singh, Aged About 75 Years, Resident of B-290, Flat Number 201 Gurunanakpura, Tilak Nagar Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Rajasthan Sarkar, Through Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Jaipur
2. Vibha Sharma, Additional Judicial Magistrate Serial No.8, Jaipur Mahanagar Second
3. Guruvendra Singh S/o Gurusharan, Former Manager, New Bank of India, Through Punjab National Bank, R/o Makan No.7 Gh-15, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur Punjab National Bank Branch Johari Bajar, Jaipur
4. Sneh Kumar Singhal S/o Shri Gheesaram Singhal, Contemporary Manager, New Bank of India Through Punjab National Bank, R/o Makan No. B-94, Shri Dadudayal Nagar, Sanganer Road D Muhana Jaipur Presently Chief Manager, Punjab National Bank Branch Johari Bajar, Jaipur
5. Narendra Kumar Jain (Bhandari), Resident of Makan No. 2362 Second Choraha, Motisingh Bhotiyo Ka Rasta, Johari Bazar Jaipur Present Address Arihant Medical Ke Samne Baisi Gaddi Gulab Bag Purniya Bihar. ----Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Surendra Kumar Jain petitioner in person.
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT Order 14/05/2025
1. Heard.
2. In view of the defect pointed registered by the Registry that contempt petition has been filed against the orders passed by the
[2025:RJ-JP:20343-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-214/2025] Division Bench as well as Single Bench, contempt petition is dismissed, however, with liberty to the petitioner to file separate contempt petitions for being heard before appropriate Benches.
3. Certified copies of the orders, if any filed, be returned to the petitioner after retaining the photo copy of the same.
(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ MANOJ NARWANI-GARIMA/205