HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29360 of 2025 Court No. - 78 HON'BLE NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel are present. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter has become infructuous, therefore, the same may be dismissed as infructuous. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. October 7, 2025 Fhd Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.) Smt. Sadhana And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad