AARYA SUNA @ FULA @ ARYA @ SUDARSAN SUNA v. STATE OF ODISHA
BLAPL/12562/2025 · 2026-01-27
Gourishankar Satapathy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 889 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 889 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.12562 of 2025
Aarya Suna @ Fula @ Arya @ Sudarsan Suna … Petitioner
Mr. S. Dwibedi, Advocate
-versus- State of Odisha … Opposite Party Mr. C. Mohanty, Addl. PP
CORAM:
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
Order No.
ORDER(ORAL) 27.01.2026
02.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode).
2. This is an application U/S.483 of BNSS by the Petitioner for grant of bail in connection with G.R. Case No.54-A of 2024 arising out of Belpada P.S. Case No.13 of 2024, pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Patnagarh, for commission of offences punishable U/S.395/120-B of IPC r/w. Sec.25/27 of the Arms Act, on the main allegation of committing dacoity by taking away one Bolero e-cart van together with consignment of goods.
3. Heard, Mr. Suryakanta Dwibedi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. C. Mohanty, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in the matter and perused the record.
4. Aafter having considered the rival
submissions and taking into consideration the nature
and gravity of the offences as alleged against the petitioner vis-à-vis the accusations sought to be brought against him and regard being had to the pre- trial detention of the petitioner in custody since 29.05.2025 and taking into account grant of bail to six co-accused persons including co-accused Pintu Jha (BLAPL No. 6012 of 2024), Prashanta Kumbhar @ Ricky (BLAPL No. 1692 of 2024) & Rahul Parabhue (BLAPL No. 9983 of 2024), who have been identified in TI parade and taking into account the other circumstances on record in entirety including the recovery of the vehicle and there being no direct evidence against the petitioner and keeping in view the mode and manner of implication of the present petitioner in this case, this Court without expressing any view on merit, admits the petitioner to bail.
5. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands allowed and the petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) only with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it.
6. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules.
(G. Satapathy)
Judge S.Sasmal Designation: Jr. Stenographer