Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88899 (MAD)

S.RANGANATHAN v. Smt.Kalaiselvi Mohan, and another

CONT P/3190/2024 · 2025-09-18

Mohammed Shaffiq, S M Subramaniam

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:MHC:2284 CONT P No. 3190 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18-09-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ CONT P No. 3190 of 2024 and SUB. A (OS) No.916 of 2025 S.Ranganathan Petitioner(s) Vs 1.Smt.Kalaiselvi Mohan, The District Collector, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram-631 501. 2.Smt. Thenmozhi, The Tahsildar, Uthiramerur Taluk, Kancheepuram District. Contemnor(s) PRAYER To punish the respondents 1 and 2 for their wilful disobedience of the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court dated 27.02.2024 made in W.P.No 4905 of 2024 For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Sugumaran Page No.1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 3190 of 2024 For Contemnor(s): Mr.D.Ravichander SGP ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The contempt petition has been instituted to punish the respondents for their disobedience of the writ order dated 27.02.2024 passed in W.P.No.4905 of 2024. 2. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2 would submit that pursuant to the orders of this Court, a decision has been taken order was passed and the same was communicated to the petitioner. Per contra, the learned counsel for the petitioner would oppose by stating that the except the 3 rd respondent in the writ petition had been removed and therefore, the respondents have committed contempt. 3. This Court is unable to agree with the learned counsel for the petitioner since this Court directed the authorities to consider the representation on merits take a decision and pass appropriate order. The said Page No.2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 3190 of 2024 exercise has already been done. That being so, this Court do not find any willful disobedience of the order. 4. Accordingly, the Contempt Petition stands closed. No costs. Consequently, the connected application is also closed. (S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.)(MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ J.) 18-09-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No Jeni To 1.The District Collector Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram-631 501. 2.The Tahsildar, Uthiramerur Taluk, , Kancheepuram-603 107. Page No.3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 3190 of 2024 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ J. Jeni CONT P No. 3190 of 2024 18-09-2025 Page No.4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis