Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43079 WP No. 26147 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K WRIT PETITION NO. 26147 OF 2013 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI NANDISH S/O LACHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O NO-50, BHOGANAHALLI VILLAGE, BBMP-WARD NO-150, BELLANDOOR, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT, PIN-560 031.
2. SRI.SHANKER S/O LATE SALAPURAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O NO-50, BHOGANAHALLI VILLAGE, BBMP-WARD NO.150 BELLANDOOR, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT PIN-560 032 …PETITIONERS (BY MR. HARSHITH B HIREMATH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. C.M NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF THE REVENUE, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDI, Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43079 WP No. 26147 of 2013 BANGALORE-20.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DISTRICT, BANGALORE-20.
3.
4.
THE THASILDHAR K.R.PURAM, BANGALORE EAST, BANGALORE-103.
AMBLI YOGESH S/O AMBLI KOTRAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/AT NO.106, KOTTUR ROAD, HARAPPANAHALLI TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER B.M. KARUNESH S/O LATE B.M. MADAIAH.
(AMENDED CARRIED OUT AS PER
ORDER DATED 16.03.2020) …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NEELAKANTAPPA K PUJAR, HCGP FOR R1-3, SRI. VISHWANATH R HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT DATED 1.6.13 ISSUED BY R3 IN RESPECT OF THE PROPERTY BEARING SY NO.33/1PL EXTENT 1-39 GUNTAS SITUATED AT BHOGANAHALLI VILLAGE, VARTHUR HOBLI, BAANGALORE EAST TALUK VIDE ANNX-H AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43079 WP No. 26147 of 2013 ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo for withdrawal of this petition stating that, in view of the subsequent development after filing of this Writ Petition, the petitioners are not intended to pursue this Writ Petition.
2. Placing reliance on memo, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE HKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2