M/S AISHANI POWER SUPPLY PVT. LTD. v. STATE OF U.P. & 2 OTHERS
WRIC/28371/2025 · 2025-08-21
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal, Saral Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 88853 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 88853 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:144732-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 28371 of 2025 Petitioner :- M/S Aishani Power Supply Pvt. Ltd., Respondent :- State Of U.P. & 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammad Sadab Khan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Usha Kiran Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Usha Kiran,
learned counsel for respondents.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent-authority is not paying the remaining amount of Rs.4,14,521.50/- with GST interest for the work of contract of electricity articles done by the petitioner. The petitioner in respect to his grievances has submitted several representations to the respondent-authority, but respondent- authority is not paying any heed to the representation of the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no.3 to consider the grievance of the petitioner.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent no.3-Executive Engineer Mandal-IIIrd, Kanpur Electricity Supply Officer House (KESKO), Kanpur Nagar within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.3 shall consider and decide the same in strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date he receives representation of the petitioner.
5. If the Executive Engineer Mandal-IIIrd, Kanpur Electricity Supply Officer House (KESKO), Kanpur Nagar is of the view that some other authority is competent to decide the claim of the petitioner, he may refer the matter to that competent authority, who
shall decide the claim of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law within the aforesaid period.
Order Date :- 22.8.2025 Sattyarth (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J) (Saral Srivastava,J) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad