Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88840 (KAR)

SMT MAMATHA B K v. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION

WP/37674/2025 · 2025-12-17

Jyoti M

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53819 WP No. 37674 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 37674 OF 2025 (S-KSRTC) BETWEEN: SMT. MAMATHA B.K., D/O KUMAR M., AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS NO.127, BYRAMANGALA, RAMANAGARA, KARNATAKA - 562109. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. P.SHRINIVASA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION CENTRAL OFFICES, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR 2. THE BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION CENTRAL OFFICES, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560027 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. H.R.RENUKA, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53819 WP No. 37674 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Srinivas Kumar P., counsel for the petitioner and Smt.Renuka H.R., counsel appeared in person. 2. Sri.Srinivas Kumar P., counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter for sometime, submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the petition. 3. When queried, counsel submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the petition. 4. The oral submission is noted. 5. Resultantly, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Smt.Renuka H.R., counsel is permitted to file vakalath and Registry is directed to accept the same. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21