- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2979 RSA No. 200060 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.200060 OF 2024 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: RACHAPPA S/O HANAMANTHA, AGE: 80 YEARS, OCC: BILA AKKASALIGA, R/O: CHATNALLI, TQ: SHAHAPUR, DIST: YADGIRI – 585 319. …APPELLANT (BY SRI SALOMON ALFRED, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: 1. 1(a) YANKAYYA S/O NINGAYYA SINCE DECEASE BY LRS., SMT. MEENAKSHI W/O YANKAYYA, AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC: H.H., 1(b) SMT. SHARANAGOUDA S/O YANKAYYA, AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 1(c) SMT. SANGEETA D/O YANKAYYA, AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: H.H., Digitally signed by RAMESH MATHAPATI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2979 RSA No. 200060 of 2024 1(d) RAKESH S/O YANKAYYA, AGE: 24 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, ALL R/O: CHATNALLI, TQ: SHAHAPUR, DIST: YADGIRI – 585 319. 2. 2(a) DEVINDRAPPA S/O HANAMANTAPPA AGE: 24 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE (DIED THROUGH HIS LRS.,) SMT. SIDDAMMA W/O DEVINDRAPPA, AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: H.H., 2(b) KUMARI SHOBHA D/O DEVINDRAPPA, AGE: 16 YEARS (MINOR), 2(c) KUMARI BHARATI D/O DEVINDRAPPA, AGE: 14 YEARS (MINOR), (THE RESPONDENT NO. 2(B) AND 2(C) ARE MINORS THEY ARE U/G OF THEIR NATURAL MOTHER OF RESPONDENT NO. 2(A), (ALL R/O: CHATNALLI, TQ: SHAHAPUR, DIST: YADGIRI – 585 319) 3. MAREPPA S/O YAMANAYYA SARPANCH, AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: CHATNALLI, TQ: SHAHAPUR, DIST: YADGIRI – 585 319. …RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE C.P.C., PAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED IN R.A.NO.32/2018 DATED 23.09.2023 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT SHAHAPUR VIDE ANNEXURE-A IN CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.08.2018 PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AT SHAHAPUR IN O.S.NO.38/2004 BY DECREEING THE SUIT IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND ETC. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2979 RSA No. 200060 of 2024 THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT None appears. Though matter was passed over and called again, there is no representation. Matter was listed for non-compliance of office objections for sixth time. There is no compliance despite sufficient opportunity. Same would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Hence, appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE NB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5 Ct;Vk