HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30341 of 2025 Court No. - 29 (SL No.5) HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. Heard Sri Vivek Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Abhinava Krishna Srivastava, learned counsel for the Kanpur Development Authority and Sri Ambrish Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standign Counsel for the State. 2. The instant writ petition has been preferred for a direction to the respondents to quash the impugned notification dated 27.04.2025 in respect of the land of the petitioner in question issued by the respondent no.1 and to direct the respondent authorities not to compel the petitioner in any manner to sign the MoU or for execution of the sale deed. 3. It transpires from the record that the instant writ petition has been filed against the impugned notification dated 27.04.2025 issued under Section 4(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (in short, 'the Act, 2013'), since no notification under Section 11 of the Act, 2013 has been notified till today, we are not inclined to entertain the writ petition at Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vivek Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhinava Krishna Srivastava, C.S.C. Umesh Nemani .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) this stage. 4. Confronted with the situation, Sri Vivek Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the instant writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed at this stage. 5. Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as withdrawn. (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) September 17, 2025 Shubham Arya WRIC No. 30341 of 2025 2 Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM ARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad