IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1229 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-185 Year-2024 Thana- CHAKIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1. Sujeet Kumar @ Sujeet Kumar Sharma Son of Kailash Prasad Sharma village- Uchhidih Ramkaran Pakri, Ps- Pipra, Dist- East champaran 2. Rambabu Thakur son of Late Brijnandan Thakur village- Uchhidih Ramkaran Pakri, Ps- Pipra, Dist- East champaran 3. Shubham Kumar son of Rambabu Thakur village- Uchhidih Ramkaran Pakri, Ps- Pipra, Dist- East champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 05-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Chakia P.S. Case No. 185 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 447, 427, 327, 337, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner nos. 3 and 1 are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner no. 2 has has antecedent of four cases and the informant alleges that accused persons including the petitioner along with ten unknown accused came variously armed on her Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1229 of 2025(2) dt.05-02-2025 2/3 land and destroyed her asbestos house and thereafter came to her house and started abusing, accordingly informant informend her husband, who in turned informed the police. Further, the police came and pacified the matter. It is next alleged that earlier also the accused persons had assaulted her and had tried to kidnap her child for which Chakiya P.S. case No. 440 of 2023 was instituted. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the husband of the informant is own brother of the petitioner no. 2 and this fact has been concealed in the FIR. It is further submitted that from the perusal of the FIR, it would manifest that informant alleges that police did not arrest any one rather pacified the matter which amply demonstrates that the occurrence took place on account of dispute between the parties relating to property. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1229 of 2025(2) dt.05-02-2025 3/3 (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Chakia P.S. Case No. 185 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. Jyoti Kumari/- (Satyavrat Verma, J.) U T