Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88799 (KAR)

RAMAPPA v. SMT. LALITHA

RPFC/96/2020 · 2025-07-21

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI RPFC NO. 96 OF 2020 BETWEEN SRI RAMAPPA, S/O LATE NANJAPPA, @ NANJUNDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/O CHATRAKODIHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, TALUK AND DISTRICT - KOLAR - 563 103 ...PETITIONER/S By SRI/SMT.: VEERANNA G. TIGADI, ADVOCATE) AND 1 . SMT. LALITHA, W/O RAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, 2 . KUMARI VAISHNAVI, AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS, (RESPONDENT NO.2 IS REPRESENTED BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN RESPONDENT NO.1, …2 RPFC No. 96 of 2020 2 R/O HOLESOMARASANAHALLI VILLAGE, HUTTUR HOBLI, TALUK & DISTRICT - KOLAR – 563 103. ...RESPONDENT/S RPFC FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 05.10.2019 PASSED IN C.MISC. No. 81/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, KOLAR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125 OF Cr.P.C. FOR MAINTENANCE. This RPFC coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order. ORAL ORDER A week’s time is granted to do the needful. By that time, if the needful is not done, the petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. Sd/- JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 21.07.2025, office objections are not complied with. Hence, the petition is hereby dismissed. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : SR R By : SB C By : GS Ty.Dt. : 31.01.2026 C.Dt : 20.02.2026