Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8879 (DEL)

DHAN VATI@DHANNO v. SATISH KUMAR

MAT.APP.(F.C.)/8/2022 · 2025-09-19

Anil Kshetarpal, Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

MAT.APP.(F.C.) 8/2022 Page 1 of 29 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: 04.09.2025 Judgment pronounced on: 19.09.2025 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 8/2022 & CM APPL. 4523/2022 (Stay) DHAN VATI @ DHANNO .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Rathi, Advocate. versus SATISH KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sudhir Tewatia, Mr. Sahil Gandhi, Mr. Aman Gahlot, Ms. Himani Verma, Ms. Kavya and Mr. Vivek, Advocates. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH V AIDYANATHAN SHANKAR JUDGMENT HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. 1. The present appeal is filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 read with Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 19551, assailing Judgment and Decree dated 30.09.2021 2 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Courts, Tis Hazari Courts (West), Delhi 3, in the matter titled ‡6K6DWLVK.XPDUYV6PW 9DWL#’KDQQR· , arising out of HMA Petition No. 526/2009 (which was subsequently renumbered as 329/2014, and later 590661/2016). 1 HMA 2 Impugned Judgement 3 Family Court