Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010096802020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 5882/2020 Between:
1. SUNKARI APPARAO, S/O. SUNKARI KONDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, H.NO.8-80, KONDA STREET, YELAMANCHILI MANDAL, ETI KOPPAKA VILLAGE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRNICPLE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI.
2. THE TAHASILDAR, YELAMANCHILI MANDALAM, VISAKAPATANAM
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM
4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SURESH KUMAR POTTURI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2 HBKM,J W.P.No.5882 of 2020
The Court made the following Order:
No representation for the petitioner, inspite of posting the matter under the caption “for dismissal”.
2. On 05.08.2025, Mr. Suresh Kumar Potturi, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought time to file change of vakalat. On 19.08.2025 also the same request has been made. But on 02.09.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Today also the same counsel submits that he is unable to contact the petitioner, inspite of making best efforts to file change of vakalat.
3. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default, as there is no alternative arrangement made by the petitioner to represent him. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN
09.09.2025 PGT