- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44018 CMP No. 109 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO. 109 OF 2025 BETWEEN: M/S SJR PRIME CORPORATION PVT LTD A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT THE HUB, SY. NO. 8/2 AND 9 GROUND FLOOR, AMBALIPURA, BELLANDUR ROAD, SARJAPUR MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE-560 103. REPRESENTED BY ITS SPA HOLDER MRS. KOMALA REDDY …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AJAY RAO., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR JAGADEESH P S SON OF SUBBARAMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, 2. MS. NIHARIKA J REDDY, DAUGHTER OF JAGADEESH P S, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS. 3. 4. 5. MR. NANDAN P S SON OF JAGADEESH P S, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS SRI. BABU AGED: MAJOR SRI. RANJITH KUMAR Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44018 CMP No. 109 of 2025 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, S/O SRI. BABU SMT. BRUNDA AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, D/O SRI. BABU, SMT. NIRMALA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, SMT. KOMALA AGED MAJOR SMT. CHALUVAMMA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, SRI. AMARESH AGED MAJOR UJWAL S/O SRI. AMARESH AGED MAJOR SMT. SHYAMALA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, SRI. P.V. KRISHNA REDDY, S/O LATE SRI. A. VEERAPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, SRI. ASHOK KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, A. VIJENDRA S/O SRI. ASHOK KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, SRI. GOPALA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, SRI. RAKESH S/O SRI. GOPALA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, SRI. RANJITH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44018 CMP No. 109 of 2025 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. S/O SRI. GOPALA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, SMT. SHARADAMMA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, SRI. PURUSHOTHAM REDDY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, MISS P.S. JAYADEEPA D/O PURUSHOTHAM REDDY, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, SRI. HARISH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, SRI. NISHANTH S/O SRI. HARISH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS SRI. NATARAJ AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, KUSHAL S/O SRI. NATARAJ AGED : MAJOR MISS VARSHA D/O SRI. NATARAJ AGED MAJOR SMT. JYOTHI, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, SMT. PADMA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS SMT. GEETHA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, SRI. NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, SUHAS AGED MAJOR - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44018 CMP No. 109 of 2025 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42(a) 43. S/O SRI. NAGARAJU MASTER CHETHAN AGED: MAJOR S/O SRI. NAGARAJU SRI. PRADEEP AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS MASTER PRAJWAL AGED MAJOR S/O SRI. PRADEEP MISS. JAISIKA AGED : MAJOR D/O OF SRI. PRADEEP SRI. P.V. KODANDARAMA REDDY S/O LATE SRI. A. VEERAPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, SMT. K. PAVITHRA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS SMT. K. VIRUPAKSHI AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS SMT. K. KAVITHA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS SMT. K. PAVANA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS SRI. K. MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS MISS CHARMI AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS D/O SRI. K. MANJUNATH BEING MINOR REP BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN SRI. K. MANJUNATH SMT. TANUJA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44018 CMP No. 109 of 2025 ALL THE RESPONDENTS RESIDING AT NO. 19/5, NEAR ASWATHA KATTE, PARAPPANA AGRAHARA VILLAGE, ELECTRONIC CITY POST, BANGALORE-560100. …RESPONDENTS THIS CMP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11(5) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 PRAYING TO APPOINT AN ARBITRATOR NAMELY JUSTICE ANANDBYRA REDDY (RETIRED JUDGE OF HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA), IN TERMS OF CLAUSE 29.4 OF JDA (AT ANNEXURE-A) DATED 9.7.2012 SO FAR AS TO ARBITRATE THE DISPUTES BETWEEN THE PARTIES AND ETC. THIS CMP, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. To appoint an Arbitrator namely Justice Ananda Byra Reddy (Retired Judge of High Court of Karnataka) in terms of Clause 29.4 of the JDA (At Annexure-A) dated 9.7.2012 so as to arbitrate the disputes between the parties. b. Grant costs of this petition to the petitioners, and c. Grant such other reliefs as this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the circumstances of the case, in the interests of justice and equity. - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44018 CMP No. 109 of 2025 2. A perusal of the Arbitration Section 21 notice indicates that the same has not been issued to all the parties of the first part in the Joint Development Agreement dated 09.07.2012 at Annexure A. 3. Reserving liberty to the petitioner to issue a fresh notice under Section 21 to all the parties, the petition stands disposed/dismissed. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE PRS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 66