Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8874 (RAJ)

OMPRAKASH S/O RAMNARAYAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2940/2025 · 2025-03-03

Anil Kumar Upman

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:9515] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2940/2025 Omprakash S/o Ramnarayan, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Village Badh Rayal, Police Station Piloda. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Gangapur City) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gajveer Singh Rajawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 03/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.28/2025 registered at Police Station Udei Mode, District Sawai Madhopur for the offences punishable under Section 8/18 of NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that recovered contraband is less than commercial quantity. Learned counsel contends that petitioner has no criminal antecedents of similar nature and he is in custody since 11.02.2025. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. Trial will take time in its conclusion. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:9515] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2940/2025] 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner; as also the fact that recovered contraband is less than commercial quantity; trial will take time in its conclusion; but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow these bail applications. 6. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Omprakash S/o Ramnarayan, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. [2025:RJ-JP:9515] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2940/2025] 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /391