HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29487 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. 1. Sri Prabhakar Awasthi, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the District Inspector of Schools, Mahoba has issued notice on 29.03.2025 to which the petitioners have given reply on 5.4.2025, which is appended as Annexure 35 to the writ petition. He has submitted that while passing the impugned order, the District Inspector of Schools has not taken into consideration of the reply submitted by the petitioners and only in one line, rejected the detailed reply of the petitioners. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners without entering into merits of the case, made innocuous prayer that the DIOS concerned may be directed to pass a fresh order after adjudicating the reply/objection of the petitioners, after hearing both the sides, expeditiously in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents and learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not objected the prayer as made by Sri Awasthi, learned counsel for the petitioner that the DIOS concerned may be directed to pass fresh order after adjudicating the objection filed by the petitioners. 4. Heard Sri Prabhakar Awasthi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State respondents and Sri Dev Kaushik holding brief of Sri Shesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners as no objection made on behalf of learned counsel for the respondents. The District Inspector of Schools, Mahoba is directed to pass a fresh order in accordance with law after hearing all affected parties and taking into consideration of the objections of the parties, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chandra Prakash Tiwari, Prabhakar Awasthi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shesh Kumar Srivastava, V.R. Tiwari Committee Of Management, Shri Durga Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, without being influenced by order dated 13.06.2025. 6. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. September 11, 2025 Pratima WRIC No. 29487 of 2025 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad