Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88712 (KAR)

SRI G GIRISH v. SMT K NAGAVENI

WP/868/2022 · 2025-10-31

S Vishwajith Shetty

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43822 WP No. 868 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY WRIT PETITION NO. 868 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI G. GIRISH S/O LATE SRI GANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS. 2. SMT. S. ROOPAKALA W/O G. GIRISH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS. BOTH ARE R/O NO.569 SRINIVASA NILAYA 8TH CROSS, SUBHASNAGAR NELAMANGALA TOWN BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 123. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI MAHESH R, ADV., - ABSENT) AND: SMT. K. NAGAVENI W/O SRI MAHADEVA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/O NO.770, 8TH BLOCK VISHVESHWARAIAH LAYOUT GIDADAKONENAHALLI NEAR MUDDHINAPALYA DEEPA COMPLEX, MALATHHALLI BENGALURU - 560 056. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI KARTHIK REDDY C, ADV., FOR R SRI VINAY SWAMY C, ADV.,) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN O.S.NO.6311/2017 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE LIX ADDITIONAL Digitally signed by NANDINI M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43822 WP No. 868 of 2022 CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-60) BENGALURU CITY.QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 17.12.2021 IN O.S.NO.6311/2017 PASSED BY THE LIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY (CCH-60) FURTHER DIRECT THE TRIAL COURT TO ACCEPT THE WRITTEN STATEMENT ON RECORD AND TO CONTINUE WITH THE SUIT BY FRAMING ISSUES. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL FOR NON- PROSECUTION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY ORAL ORDER 1. Matter called twice. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Even on the last date of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. However, in the interest of justice, this Court had finally granted a week's time to the petitioners to comply office objection failing which Registry was directed to list this petition today for the purpose of dismissal of the petition for non-prosecution. 2. Till date, office objection has not been complied nor there is any representation on behalf of the petitioners. 3. In view of the peremptory order passed by this Court on 24.10.2025, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43822 WP No. 868 of 2022 petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE DN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7