IN TH 109 Ram Niwa Jitender D Directorat CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation o ordinate B Niwas vs. disposed o Secondary representat accordance receiving a entitled to within a pe COCP-2492-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.2492 o Date of decision Niwas Versus der Dahiya, IAS, Director, Second ctorate of Secondary Education, Pan AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Bhar, Adv Mr. Swapnil, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of order dated 22.10.2024 (Anne ate Bench of this Court in CWP- s vs. State of Haryana and others= sed of with a direction <&.to ary Education, to consider a entation, dated 19.08.2024, by pas ance with law, within a period of th ing a certified copy of this order. In d to the benefits claimed, the same a period of six weeks therefrom. Fur 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 2492 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-10.02.2026 &..Petitioner econdary Education Haryana, n, Panchkula, Haryana &..Respondent E NIDHI GUPTA r, Advocate with dl. A.G., Haryana. ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- -28606-2024 titled as <Ram =, whereby the petition was respondent No.2/Director r and decide the pending passing a speaking order in of three months from the date of . In case the petitioner is found same shall be released to him . Further, the petitioner shall be VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.12 09.37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document at liberty concerning Jitender K Panchkula dated 09.1 Registry, w Copy there submits tha (Annexure had been pa COCP-2492-2025 (O & M) rty to make a separate represen ning his claim for the Grade Pay or Reply dated 22.1.2026 by der Kumar, Director General, Secon hkula on behalf of respondent No.1 09.1.2026 (Annexure R-1) has a stry, which is annexed on the file. Th thereof is supplied to the counsel for Learned counsel for the State its that in compliance of the Writ Co exure P-1), a Speaking Order dated een passed, wherein, it is recorded as <&.Whereas, an am outstanding principal & Marriage Advance Loa Excess payment due to @ 2,03,408/- +¹7,883/ were recoverable fro which an amount of qua the outstanding am excess amount of Rs. petitioner and the same petitioner vide PUNBN6202508200820 the petitioner account N an amount of ¹11520/ the petitioner PUNBN6202512300838 India Account No. 201 2 esentation to the respondents y or any other related issue&.= by way of affidavit of Shri Secondary Education Haryana, No.1 alongwith Speaking Order has already been filed in the le. The same is taken on record. el for the petitioner. State refers to the said reply and rit Court order dated 22.10.2024 dated 09.1.2026 (Annexure R-1) ed as follows :- amount of ¹3,23,398/- (as al & interest amount of HBA, Loan, Leave Encashment and e to wrong fixation of 3rd ACP 883/- + ¹91,768/- + ¹20,339/-) from the petitioner against of ¹3,69,655/ were recovered amount towards him. Thus, an Rs. 46,257/- was paid by the same has been refunded to the RTGS UTR No 08203595 dated 20-08-2025 in unt No. 20143580216. Further, 20/- has also been refunded to vide UTR No. 08388458 in his State Bank of 20143580216. Accordingly, an VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.12 09.37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Court orde that <&th representat Pay or an accordingly (Annexure received fro direction o 29.10.2024 petitioner considered the submis contempt p learned co disposed o COCP-2492-2025 (O & M) amount of ¹57,777/- been refunded to the pe in State of Bank 20143580216. In view above, admissible amou has already been paid prayer for interest mad writ petition is hereby merit&.=. Learned counsel for the petitio t order dated 22.10.2024, the Writ C &the petitioner shall be at libe entation to the respondents concerni r any other relates issue.=. Lear rdingly the petitioner had made a repre exure P-8); in this regard, howeve ved from the respondents. Learned counsel for the Stat tion of the Writ Court to decide 0.2024 (Annexure P-8), however, s ioner has submitted such a represen idered and decided in accordance with Learned counsel for the petitio ubmissions made by learned counsel empt petition may be disposed of as su In view of the above facts ed counsel for the parties, the pre osed of. 3 (¹46,257/-+ 11,520/-) has he petitioner in two installment nk of India account No. view of the submissions made amount of refund i.e. ¹57,777/- paid to the petitioner and the made by the petitioner in his reby rejected being devoid of petitioner submits that vide Writ Writ Court had further observed liberty to make a separate cerning his claim for the Grade Learned counsel submits that a representation dated 29.10.2024 owever, no response has been e State submits that there is no decide the representation dated ver, submits that in case the presentation, the same shall be e with law. petitioner submits that in view of ounsel for the State, the present f as such. facts and submissions made by he present contempt petition is VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.12 09.37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document February Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-2492-2025 (O & M) Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, uary 10, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 4 if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.12 09.37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document