Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88686 (KAR)

MR. RAJESH, v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.RP/576/2023 · 2025-11-17

Ravi V Hosmani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46987 CRL.RP No. 576 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 576 OF 2023 BETWEEN: MR. RAJESH, S/O CHIKKAHANUMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT JAKKANAHALLI, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU - 562 123. …PETITIONER (BY SRI GIRISH R.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY THYAMAGONDLU P S., NELAMANGALA TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY SPP, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE - 560 052. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.ANITHA GIRISH N., HCGP) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S. 397 R/W 401 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 18.04.2023 PASSED IN CASE NO.MAG SR 11/2023 ON THE FILE OF ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION, DODDABALLAPUR, BY ALLOWING THE ABOVE REVISION PETITION UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46987 CRL.RP No. 576 of 2023 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Challenging order dated 18.04.2023 bearing no.JA.J.f ¹Dgï 11/2023 passed by Assistant Commissioner, Doddaballapura Sub-Division, Doddaballapura, this Revision Petition is filed. 2. Sri Girish R., learned counsel for petitioner submitted that period of externment under impugned order was for 90 days i.e., from 18.04.2023 to 17.07.2023, which has been expired during pendency of this revision petition. Therefore, impugned order is spent. 3. Smt.N. Anitha Girish, learned HCGP for respondents does not dispute submission. 4. In view of above, revision petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE GRD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 51