Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88686 (ALL)

ANIL KUMAR PATEL @ ANIL PATEL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/28628/2025 · 2025-09-07

Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar J Criminal, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 28628 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State respondent and Sri Rajesh Kumar Yadav, holding brief of Sri Vijay Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Bank. 2. Counsel on behalf of the petitioner has stated that the petitioner had taken loan but the same could not be repaid as per the terms of the agreement. A possession notice dated July 24, 2025 has been issued by the respondents to which challenge has been made in the instant writ petition. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the petitioner is ready and willing to deposit the amount due against him in case he is permitted to do so in easy installments. 3. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Bank submits that the Bank is ready to accept the amount, which is due as on September 6, 2025, i.e. Rs.25,80,600/- and odd, if the petitioner deposits the same in monthly installments. 4. Upon hearing the counsel appearing on behalf of the parties and after considering the material on record, we are of the view that the appropriate direction should be issued. 5. Accordingly, we direct that the initial payment of 25% of the aforementioned due amount shall be made by the petitioner within a period of three weeks from date. On initial payment being made, the respondent Bank shall provide the statement of account to the petitioner forthwith. Thereafter, the balance amount shall be paid by the petitioner in four equal monthly installments starting from December, 2025. 6. Till the period prescribed for depositing the aforesaid amount, the recovery proceedings against the petitioner will be kept in abeyance. However, we make it clear that in case the petitioner defaults in Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mir Sayed Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Vijay Kumar Srivastava Anil Kumar Patel @ Anil Patel .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) depositing the initial amount or thereafter the installments within the stipulated period, it will be open for the respondent Bank to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law. 7. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. September 8, 2025 Kuldeep WRIC No. 28628 of 2025 2 (Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad