BHUPENDRA KUMAR CHAUDHARI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/12231/2025 · 2025-08-22
Manju Rani Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 88685 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 88685 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:146006 Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 12231 of 2025 Petitioner :- Bhupendra Kumar Chaudhari Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Kumar,Soumyesh Dutt Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kushmondeya Shahi Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Heard Mr. Krishna Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent, Mr. Kushmondeya Shahi, learned counsel for the respondent nos.3 to 5 and perused the record. The petitioner has preferred instant writ petition for a direction upon respondents to sanction and disburse leave encashment for 300 days consequent upon retirement of the petitioner and a further prayer to disburse the same alongwith interest at such penal rate as may be specified by this Court.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner moved a representation before the respondent no.4 requesting for sanction and disbursement of leave encashment for 300 days consequent upon his retirement, but nothing has been done.
Learned counsel for the respondent nos.3 to 5 submits that the petitioner is not entitled for the relief as his appointment was subsequent to the constitution of the Board, however, in case petitioner move fresh representation before the respondent no.4, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioner may make fresh application/representation, ventilating all his grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.4; District Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Prayagraj within two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this
order. On such representation being made, respondent no.4 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking
order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties
concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment.
Order Date :- 23.8.2025 Jitendra/- Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad