Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8868 (GAU)

PADUM DAS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Crl.)/258/2025 · 2025-07-29

Anjan Moni Kalita, Michael Zothankhuma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010049532025 2025:GAU-AS:9750- DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/258/2025 PADUM DAS S/O. SRI DHANANJAY DAS, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BORDOLONI, MAYANG, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSCUTOR, ASSAM. 2:SUJIT SIKDAR S/O. SRI NARESH SIKDAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BORDOLONI MAYANG DIST. MORIGAON ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MS B R A SULTANA, FOR LEGAL AID Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 30.07.2025 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Heard Ms. B.R.A. Sultana, learned Legal Aid Counsel for the applicant, who submits that there is a delay of 39 days in preferring the connected appeal. Page No.# 2/2 Ms. A. Begum, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam has got no objection to the delay being condoned. On considering the submissions of the learned counsels for the parties, we find that sufficient cause for the delay has been made out. Accordingly, the delay is condoned. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same after a week. I.A. is accordingly allowed and disposed off. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant