Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8867 (HP)

SANT RAM v. THE HRTC AND ANOTHER

CWP/3844/2025 · 2025-03-19

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP Nos. 3844, 3847 & 3848/2025 Decided on: 19.03.2025 1. CWP No. 3844/2025 Sant Ram …Petitioner Versus HRTC & Anr. .…Respondents. 2. CWP No. 3847/2025 Vinod Ram …Petitioner Versus HRTC & Anr. .…Respondents. 3. CWP No. 3848/2025 Balbir Singh …Petitioner Versus HRTC & Anr. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner(s): Mr. Mayank Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent(s): Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Notice. Mr. Rahul Thakur, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2. These writ petitions have been filed for the grant of almost common substantive reliefs. Relief clause herein is extracted from CWP No. 3844/2025:-:- ““(i) That the respondents may kindly be directed to regularize the service of the petitioner from his initial date of appointment with all consequential benefits, along with interest at market rate till such time the payment is made. (ii) That or in alternative the respondent corporation may kindly be directed to regularize the services of the applicant immediately after one year with all consequential benefits.” 3. Learned vice counsel for the petitioner(s) submitted that the issue involved and the reliefs prayed for by the petitioner(s) have already been adjudicated in Vikram Singh Vs. Himachal Road Transport Corporation2. Learned vice counsel further submitted that the petitioner(s) would be content, if the cases of the petitioner(s), are considered by the respondents, in light of the aforesaid judgment within a time-bound schedule. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to this prayer. 4. Having regard to above submissions but without examining the merits of the matters, these instant petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioner(s) in light of the aforesaid judgment and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the 21CWPOA No. 2343 of 2020 decided on 09.11.2023. 3 date of receipt of copy of this order. The decision so arrived at, shall be communicated to the petitioner(s). Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 19th March, 2025(rohit)