Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88666 (KAR)

V V SATHYANARAYANA GUPTA v. THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER (SOUTH)

WP/22922/2025 · 2025-08-01

M I Arun

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29828 WP No. 22922 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.22922 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. V V SATHYANARAYANA GUPTA S/O. V.M. VENKATARAMAIAH SETTY AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 2. Y.V. RAMAMURTHY, S/O. V.M. VENKATARAMAIAH SHETTY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.5, MOODALAPPA CROSS, DODDA MAVALLI, BENGALURU-560 004. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M.K. KEMPEGOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER (SOUTH) BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE 9TH CROSS, 9TH MAIN, JAYANAGAR 2ND BLOCK, CORPORATION BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 011. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. PAWAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29828 WP No. 22922 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 02.07.2025 PASSED IN NO.©©JA¦/ªÀ.C(zÀ)¹Ü.C/¦.Dgï/39/2025-26 BY THE RESPONDENT, ZONAL COMMISSIONER (SOUTH), BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, BENGALURU, VIDE ANNEXURE-E, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER The petitioners have challenged the order passed by the respondent under Section 248(3) and 356(1) of the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike Act, 2020 (for short 'the BBMP Act'). 2. It is seen that the petitioners are having an alternative and efficacious remedy under Section 253 of the BBMP Act. On the said ground, the writ petition is hereby dismissed - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29828 WP No. 22922 of 2025 reserving the liberty to the petitioners to approach appropriate Authority in the manner known to law. 3. In the event of filing an appeal, the time spent by the petitioners before this Court shall be condoned by the Authorities concerned while considering the application for condonation of delay. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE VMB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11