Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88660 (KAR)

CHOLAMANDALAM MS GIC LTD. v. SMT. SHARADAMMA

MFA/4316/2020 · 2025-12-13

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. ARAVIND & Dr. S.V. GIRIKUMAR., CONCILIATOR M.F.A.No.4316 OF 2020 (MV) (Lok Adalat No.8450/2025) BETWEEN: CHOLAMANDALAM MS GIC LTD., DARE HOUSE NO.2, 2ND FLOOR NSC BOSE ROAD, CHENNAI-600001, ALSO AT 6TH FLOOR, GOLDEN HEIGHTS BUILDING, NEAR SUJATHA THEATRE, RAJAJI NAGAR, BENGALURU-10, REPRESENTED BY ITS DY.MANAGER ...APPELLANT (BY SRI MURALIDHARA N, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. SHARADAMMA, 1ST W/O LATE K CHOODAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, 2. SRI NAGESH BABU C S/O LATE K CHOODAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 2 3. SRI PUTTARAJU C S/O LATE K CHOODAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 4. SRI MAHESH C S/O LATE CHOODAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 5. SMT LAKSHMAMMA 2ND W/O LATE K CHOODAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 6. PREETHI C D/O LATE CHOODAPPA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 7. SRI PRATHAP C S/O LATE CHOODAPPA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF NO.38 MATHRU SREE NILAYA PUMP HOUSE MAIN ROAD WARD NO.8, ANEKAL TOWN BENGALURU DISTRICT-562106. 8. M/S GOLDEN FRESH, NO.3, QUEENS ROAD NEAR CONGRESS COMMITTEE OFFICE, VASANTH NAGAR,BENGALURU-560 052. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI MANIVANNAN G, ADVOCATE) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 30.11.2019, PASSED IN MVC NO.19/2016, ON THE FILE OF THE III-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND MACT, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, SIT AT ANEKAL, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.8,26,000/- WITH INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 6 PERCENT P.A., FROM THE DATE OF ORDER UNTIL ITS REALIZATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: 3 CONCILIATION ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the appellant – Insurance Company has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the above appeal as not pressed. Further, the learned counsel for the appellant - Insurance Company prays that the amount if any, deposited before this Court may kindly be transferred to the Claims Tribunal. The said memo is placed on record. 2. Accordingly, the above appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The amount if any, deposited before this Court shall be transferred to the Claims Tribunal. Draw the award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- CONCILIATOR DDU