2025:UHC:8434 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1/1203/2025 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. M.S. Pal, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Amit Kapri and Ms. Amreen Bano, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Vijay Khanduri, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Present applicant Uday, S/o Chandan Gihar is praying for bail in relation to FIR dated 21.04.2025, bearing FIR No. 109 of 2025, registered at P.S. Transit Camp, District U.S. Nagar which was lodged against one Dharmendra, his wife Archana and his brother-in-law Himanshu and one unknown person. On this FIR, the investigation was completed and charge sheet has been filed wherein four persons, namely, Dharmendra, Archana, Himanshu and Uday (present applicant) has been charge sheeted for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 351(2), 190, 191(3) of BNS 2023 and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act. 4. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated which is evident from the fact that applicant is not named in the FIR. It is further submitted that since charge sheet has already been filed, as such, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant. He further argued that applicant is languishing in jail since 24.04.2025, and other co- accused ,namely, “Dharmendra” who was named in the FIR has already been enlarged on bail on 01.08.2025. It is further argued that the applicant has no previous criminal history. 5. On the other side, Mr. Vijay 2025:UHC:8434 Khanduri, learned Brief Holder for the State has not disputed this fact that other co-accused “Dharmendra” has already been enlarged on bail and the charge sheet has already been filed, and, as such, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant and furthermore applicant has no previous criminal history. 6. After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties, and further taking into consideration that charge sheet has already been filed, and, as such, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant and furthermore the applicant has no previous criminal history, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail. 7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant Uday be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 19.09.2025 Parul 2025:UHC:8434