Pinninti Sanyasirao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/5862/2020 · 2025-08-04
B Krishna Mohan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8866 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8866 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010096612020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 5862/2020 Between:
1. PINNINTI SANYASIRAO,, AGED 55 YEARS, S / O SATYANARAYANA, D-NO-5- 27, PANDRANGI. VISAKHAPATNAM DIST, ANDHRA PRADESH-531162.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, 4TH. BLOCK, GROUND FLOOR, ROOM NO.135, A. P SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST, ANDHRA PRADESH.
2. THE DIST COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH.
3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, , VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH.
4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM.
5. THE TAHSILDAR, , PADMANABHAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM ANDHRA PRADESH.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. JADA SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2 HBKM,J W.P.No.5862 of 2020
The Court made the following Order:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents.
2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in unauthorizedly interfering with the petitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.84 cents in Sy.No.159/5 of Pandrangi Village, Visakhapatnam District.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now that the respondent authorities concerned are trying to interfere with the peaceful possession of the petitioner’s subject land without following the due procedure.
4. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that, if so warranted, the respondent authorities concerned will proceed with the subject land by following the due procedure.
5. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the respondent authorities concerned are directed to deal with the subject land in an extent of Ac.0.48 cents in Sy.No.159/5 of Pandrangi Village of Visakhapatnam District strictly in accordance with law if so warranted for any public purpose and if the petitioner is otherwise found to be in possession of the same, he shall be dealt with strictly in accordance with law by following the due procedure.
3 HBKM,J W.P.No.5862 of 2020
6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 05.08.2025 PGT