M ENNAGARA YELLAMMA DEVARA DEVASTHANADA v. RAMACHANDRAPPA
WP/25742/2015 · 2025-11-13
Rajesh Rai K
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 88653 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 88653 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46349 WP No. 25742 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K WRIT PETITION NO.25742 OF 2015 (LR) BETWEEN:
1.
M ENNAGARA YELLAMMA DEVARA DEVASTHANADA SHREE SHREE JYOTHIRLINGA SWAMIGALA GADHUGE SEVA SAMITHI, A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE KARNATAKA SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT,1960 ENNAGARA VILLAG,JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MAHESH B. G.
2.
YELLAMMA DEVI DEITY, ENNAGARA VILLAGE, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, B. G. MAHESH. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SARAVANA S., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. RAMACHANDRAPPA S/O LATE MUNISWAMAPPA, AGED 47 YEARS, ENNAGARA VILLAGE, JIGANI HOBLI, Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46349 WP No. 25742 of 2015 ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT- 560072.
2.
S REVANNA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
3.
S SUNANDAMMA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
4.
S SRIKANTAIAH AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
5.
S NAGARATHNAMMA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
6.
S NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS RESPONDENTS 2 TO 6 ARE CHILDREN OF LATE N. SIDDAPPA R/AT ENNAGARA VILLAGE, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT - 560072.
7. UMADEVI W/O LATE S SHYAMASUNDAR, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
8.
SRI DARSHAN, S/O LATE S SHYAMASUNDAR, AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS
9. SAVITHA, D/O LATE S SHYAMASUNDAR, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS RESPONDENTS NO. 7 TO 9 ARE RESIDING AT ENNAGARA VILLAGE, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT - 560072.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46349 WP No. 25742 of 2015
10.
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M S BUILDINGS, BANGALORE - 560072.
11.
THE LAND TRIBUNAL, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT - 560072.
BY ITS SECRETARY …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V.M. LAKSHMIPATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R7-R9;
SRI. NEELAKANTAPPA K.PUJAR, HCGP FOR R10 AND R11;
PETITION STANDS DISMISSED AGAINST R2 TO R6, V/O. DATED 27.05.2019)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEX-D THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE LAND TRIBUNAL, ANEKAL TALUK, ANEKAL IN PROCEEDING NO.LRF.IN7,818,648/81-82 DATED 08.07.1982 AND ALSO TO QUASH ANNEX-E THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE LAND TRIBUNAL, ANEKAL TALUK IN PROCEEDINGS NO.LRF.42/83-84 DATED 16.8.1998.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46349 WP No. 25742 of 2015 ORAL ORDER
The learned counsel for respondent No.1 filed a memo dated 29.10.2024 by reporting the death of the petitioner that he has expired on 03.07.2025. No successors have come on record.
2. On the last date of hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought accommodation to secure instructions as to whether the successors are interested to pursue this petition or not. Today the learned counsel submits that he is unable to secure any instruction from legal representatives of the petitioner to pursue this writ petition.
3. In such circumstances, there is no reason to keep this writ petition pending. Accordingly, the writ petition is abated. Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE DS CT:TSM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6