IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 123 CR-80-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.09.2026 Sukhvir and others ...Petitioners Versus Pooja and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present:- None for the petitioners. ***** VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer in the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is for setting aside order dated 18.06.2024 passed by learned District Judge/Duty Judge, Sonipat, whereby the appeal preferred against order dated 31.05.2024 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Gohana, declining the grant of ad interim injunction against alienation of suit land, has been dismissed. 2. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. The following order was passed on 12.11.2025:- “Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks time to apprise the Court about the status of the application filed by the respondents/defendants under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC before the learned trial Court. Adjourned to 10.09.2026.” 3. It has been brought to the notice of this Court that the main suit, from which the instant revision arises, has since been dismissed in default HARISH KUMAR 2026.09.11 18:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CR-80-2025 (O&M) (2) vide order dated 31.05.2025 and as per the status available on eCourts web-portal, the same still reflects ‘dismissed in default for want of prosecution’. 4. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Pending applications, if any, also stand closed. ( VIKAS SURI ) September 10, 2026 JUDGE harish Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No HARISH KUMAR 2026.09.11 18:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment