Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8865 (JHR)

SAROBI DEVI ALIAS SUROMI KUMARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3032/2025 · 2025-04-21

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:11778] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3032 of 2025 ------ 1. Sarobi Devi @ Suromi Kumari, aged about-19 years Daughter of Santosh Mandal 2. Sulekha Devi, aged about 36 years wife of Santosh Mandal, both resident of village-Uttari Begamganj, P.O. Begamganj, P.S. Radhanagar, Dist.-Sahibganj .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Kumar Keshri, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 21-04-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Radhanagar P.S. Case No.138 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 103(1), 303(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, committed murder of the husband of the informant namely Narad Mandal. It is next submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are false. It is further submitted that the only allegation against the petitioners is that petitioners caught hold the scrotum of the deceased and the same by hanging from the same. It is further submitted that the post-mortem report of the deceased shows that there is no swelling on the testis and the primary cause of death is CRF and secondary cause of death was reserved for forensic analysis. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will cooperate with the trial of the case and also undertakes that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case during the trial of the case in any manner. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 06.02.2025 as is evident from para-1 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that charge-sheet have been submitted against them. Hence it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Rajmahal in connection with Radhanagar P.S. Case No.138 of 2024 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the trial of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Rohit/