APHC010097152016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 21216/2016 Between: 1. K.NAGESWARA RAO,, S/O K.V.PUNNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, WORKING AS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SRI BRAHMARAMBIKA MALLIKARJUNA SWAMYVARI DEVASTHANAM, SRISAILAM, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P., ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE (ENTS) DEPT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE. 2. COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, BOGGULAKUNTA, TILAK ROAD, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE. 3. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI BRAHMARAMBIKA MALLIKARJUNA SWAMYVARI DEVASTHANAM, SRISAILAM, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P., ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, Declaring that the impugned Proceedings in Rc.No.Q/15338/2016 dated 22.6.2016 of the 2nd respondent and consequential order of the 3rd respondent vide Proceedings Rc.No.A1/3263/2016 dated 23.6.2016, as illegal, arbitrary, malafide, without application of mind, against the principles of fair play and violative of principles of natural justice, and consequently to set-aside the same, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 26018 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned Proceedings in Rc.No.Q/15338/2016 dated 22.6.2016 of the 2nd respondent and consequential order of the 3rd respondent vide Proceedings Rc.No.A1/3263/2016 dated 23.6.2016, to enable to petitioner to continue at the 4th respondent devasthanam, pending the above writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2016(WPMP 26742 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to treat the additional grounds(n) to (AA) as part and parcel of the grounds already raised in the main writ petitioner i.e., WP no.20997/2016, in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N BHARAT BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. T VENU GOPAL SC FOR ENDOWMENTS (RAYALASEEMA REGION) 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Y.Raghava, learned counsel representing Sri N.Bharat Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner brought to the notice of this Court that in view of subsequent events taken place after filing this petition, the cause of action in the lis does not survive for adjudication and reported that the matter has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 24th September, 2025 RKS