- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36664 WP No. 25939 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 25939 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: M/S. ADINATH TRANSPORT CO., A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING OFFICE AT NO.38/5-11, 1ST MAIN ROAD, INDUSTRIAL SUBURB, YASHWANTHPURA, BENGALURU CITY – 560 022, REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY AND MANAGER, MRS. SARIKA MANOJ AGARWAL. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRASANNA V. R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S. FOXBASE TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD., HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.13, RAHAT, COLES ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, BENGALURU – 560 005, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. MRS. JAYA GARG, AGE: MAJOR, D/O MR. BHAVANI SHANKAR GOYAL, DIRECTOR OF Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36664 WP No. 25939 of 2025 FOXBASE TACHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD., R/AT A-306, SIROYA ENVIRON, 24, CHOLA NAGAR, ANANDA NAGAR, HEBBAL, BENGALURU – 560 024. 3. MRS. JAYANTI CHHAWCHHARIA, AGE: MAJOR, D/O MR. BHAVANI SHANKAR GOYAL, DIRECTOR OF FOXBASE TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD., R/AT NO.10C, GEM HOUSE, 5B RESEL STRET, MIDDLETON ROW, KOLKATTA – 700 071. 4. MR. MERLIN RORY PICARDO, AGE: MAJOR, S/O JOSEPH PICARDO, DIRECTOR OF FOXBASE TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD., R/AT 2-81B, HALSUS, PANDESHWARA, UDUPI, KARNATAKA – 576 226. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 26.06.2025 ON IA NO.3 TO 5 IN COM. OS NO. 630/2021 ON THE FILE OF LEARNED LXXXIX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY (CCH-90) VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36664 WP No. 25939 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter at length would seek leave of this Court to urge all the contentions that are urged in the subject petition and the reason for urging before the concerned Court at the appropriate point of time. 2. It is needless to observe that those submissions would merit consideration at the hands of the concerned Court at the appropriate stage. With the aforesaid observations, the Writ Petition stands disposed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE CBC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 52