DHARVENDRA PRAKASH BHARDWAJ v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
WPSS/1066/2023 · 2025-10-13
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8864 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8864 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
13.10.2025
WPSS No. 1066 of 2023 With WPSS No. 1242 of 2023 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Ms. Sazia Parveen, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Mamta Bisht, Deputy Advocate General for the State.
2. Ms. Sazia Parveen, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the petitioner makes a statement that writ petitions have become infructuous by efflux of time.
3. In view of the statement, so made by
learned counsel for the petitioner, writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous.
4. Pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 13.10.2025 Mahinder/