Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88607 (ALL)

DASHRATH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/18395/2025 · 2025-10-12

Lakshmi Kant Shukla, Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18395 of 2025 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J. 1. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been preferred by the petitioner seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent nos. 2 and 3 to conduct fair investigation in F.I.R. dated 01.07.2025, giving rise to Case Crime No. 197 of 2025, under Section 87 B.N.S., Police Station Kotwali, District Jaunpur and to recover the daughter of the petitioner from the illegal custody of respondent no. 4 within a determinate period of time. 2. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.K. Ojha, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State and perused the material available on record. 3. After some length of arguments, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State apprised the Court that the investigation has been completed and after completion of investigation a final report has been filed on 23.08.2025. 4. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the statement given by the learned A.G.A. with liberty to the petitioner to avail other remedy available to him under the law. 5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and the fact that investigation has already been completed and a final report has also been filed, we do not find any good Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajeet Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Dashrath Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) reason to keep this matter pending for further adjudication. 6. Accordingly, in view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail such other remedy available to him under the law, as advised. October 13, 2025 Brijesh Maurya CRLP No. 18395 of 2025 2 (Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad