APHC010096412007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 22127/2007 Between: 1. B. SATYANARAYANA, W.G. DISTRICT, S/O. BANGARAIAH, DY. PLANTATION MANAGER, (UNDER DISMISSAL) A.P. FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE AP FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION HYD ANOTHER, REP BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, 3RD FLOOR, UNI BUILDINGS, A.C. GUARDS, HYDERABAD - 500 004. 2. THE A P FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, REP BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER, ELURU. WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in issuing the impugned proceedings Ref.No.PD/6359/2000-633, office order No. 36/2007 dt. 20-2-2007 as arbitrary, illegal and set aside the same and against the Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the constitution of India and consequently declare that the petitioner is entitled to continue in service pending disposal of the Crl.A.M.P.No. 311 of 2007 in Criminal Appeal No. 237 of 2007 dt. 27-2-2007 with all consequential benefits and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 28679 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of impugned proceedings Ref.No. PD/6359/2000-633, office order No. 36/2007 dt. 20-2-2007 of the first respondent and to continue the petitioner as a Deputy Plantation Manager, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2008(WVMP 1764 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim suspension orders granted on 12.10.2007 in WPMP No. 28679/2007 in W.P.No. 22127/2007 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S SATYAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SRIDEVI GANTA SC For A.P.FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 2. . The Court made the following: ORDER: There is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Ms.Sridevi Ganta, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents submitted that pursuant to the interim orders dated 12.10.2007, the petitioner has been taken into service, as such, the cause in the writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. However, if the petitioner feels that the cause still survives, he can file appropriate application within a period of two (02) months. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 15th September, 2025 RKS