Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88587 (PNJ)

JAI KISHAN AND ORS v. KRISHANA & ANR

RSA/4349/2015 · 2025-03-24

Suvir Sehgal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RSA-4349-2015(O&M) 113 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-4349-2015(O&M) Date of Decision :- 24.03.2025 Jai Kishan and others .......Appellants Versus Smt. Krishana and another .......Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: Mr. Chanderhas Yadav, Advocate for the applicant/appellants. None for respondent No.1. Mr. Gaurav Deep Goel, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) CM-7762-C-2024 1. Annexure AZ is taken on record. 2. Application is disposed off. RSA-4349-2015(O&M) 3. Prayer in the application (CM-7763-C-2024) is for disposal of the appeal in terms of the compromise dated 29.06.2024, Annexure AZ, arrived at between the parties. 4. Counsel for the applicant/appellants submits that a settlement has taken place between the appellants/defendants and BRIJ MOHAN 2025.03.28 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh 2- settled. 5. Counsel for respondent No.2 states that although respondent No.2 is not party to the settlement, but he does not have any objection in case the appeal is disposed off, in terms of the settlement. 6. Appeal is disposed off in terms of the settlement, which is ordered to be made a part the decree. 7. Pending miscellaneous application (if any), stand disposed off. 24.03.2025 (SUVIR SEHGAL) Brij JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No BRIJ MOHAN 2025.03.28 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh