IMTIYAJ ANSARI ALIAS MD. INTAYZ ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./2360/2025 · 2025-07-01
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8858 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8858 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:17411] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.2360 of 2025
------
1. Imtiyaj Ansari @ Md. Intayz Ansari, aged about 35 years, son of Aslam Ansari @ Md. Aslam Ansari
2. Jahangir Ansari, aged about 38 years, S/o Imani Ansari
3. Hemajuddin Ansari, aged about 28 years, son of Md. Aslam Ansari @ Aslam Ansari
All resident of Village- Pokhar, P.O. & P.S.- Ranga, District- Sahibganj (Jharkhand)
.... .... …. Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners : Mr. Rishi Ranjan Vats, Advocate
Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Someshwar Roy, Addl.P.P
For the Informant : Mr. Deepak Sahu, Advocate
------
Order No.02 Dated- 01-07-2025 I.A. No.7157 of 2025
Heard the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this interlocutory application has been filed with a prayer for early hearing of the instant bail application.
Since, the hearing of instant bail application is taken up today, hence, this interlocutory application stands rejected being infructuous.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) B.A. No.2360 of 2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioners have been made accused in connection Ranga P.S. Case No.04 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 191 (2), 191 (3), 190, 115 (2), 118 (1), 117 (2) and 109 of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were members of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of the assembly attempted to commit the murder of Kamruddin Ansari. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is next submitted that for the self-same occurrence, Ranga P.S. Case No.06 of 2025 has also been registered from the side of the petitioner. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-11 of the instant bail application,
learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will co- operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 18.01.2025 as is evident from para-12 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the informant oppose the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajmahal in connection with Ranga P.S. Case No.04 of 2025 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/