2025:HHC:34126 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Exe. Pt. No. 156 of 2025 Decided on : 08.10.2025 Mohan Lal …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Sat Prakash, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as of now the arrears, to which the petitioner is entitled to, in terms of the judgment in issue, remain unpaid, though fixation of the said amount has been done by the Department. 2. In light of this fact, these proceedings are closed, with the direction that let the arrears be definitely paid to the petitioner, within a period of six weeks from today, failing which 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:34126 the petitioner shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the execution petition and Registry shall not insist upon the application being accompanied by the affidavit of the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge October 08, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)