Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88551 (KAR)

SRI. JOGINDER SINGH CHAWLA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/17573/2024 · 2025-12-12

R Nataraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52898 WP No. 17573 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 17573 OF 2024 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: SRI. JOGINDER SINGH CHAWLA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS S/O. LATE SAROOP SINGH CHAWLA RESIDING AT NO.102, 1ST FLOOR, "CHAWLA RESIDENCY", MOSQUE ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, BANGALORE-560005. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAGESH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. BHARADWAJ K.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, BANGALORE-560001. 3. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BBMP, WARD NO.24 BANGALORE-560001. 4. MR. MARK SUNDER RAJAN AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS S/O LATE P.N. MARK RESIDING AT NO.AVEMARIA, NO.1C-305, 1ST CROSS, 3RD BLOCK, HRBR LAYOUT NEHRU ROAD Digitally signed by MARKONAHALLI RAMU PRIYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52898 WP No. 17573 of 2024 BANGALORE-560084. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B. BOPANNA, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1; SRI. PAWAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 02.12.2022 GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-L AND PASS SUITABLE ORDER TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3 AUTHORITIES TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS AS PROVISIONS OF THE BBMP ACT 2020. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition as not pressed. 2. The memo is taken on record. In view of the memo, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7