- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46233 WP No. 18647 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 18647 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. ZAMRUD PASHA S/O T.A. AMANULLA KHAN, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT 1ST CROSS, MYSORE ROAD, NAGAMANGALA TOWN-571 432, MANDYA DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JAGADISH J.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. RAZIYA BEGUM W/O T.A. AMANULLA KHAN, AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS, R/AT NO.1302, 1ST STAGE, CHRISTIAN COLONY, RAJEEV NAGAR, MYSORE-570 007. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TIPATURU SUB DIVISION, TUMAKURU-572 101. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MAINTENANCE AND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL TUMUKUR DISTRICT, TUMAKURU-572 101. 4. MR RAHAMATULLA KHAN @ FAYAZ KHAN S/O. ABEDULLA KHAN, Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46233 WP No. 18647 of 2022 AGED MAJOR, R/AT 11TH WARD, BEHIND JAMIA MASJID, BAAVIKERE, TURAVEKERE TOWN-572 227, TUMKUR DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. DIVAKARA P.S., ADVOCATE FOR R1 (R1 DEAD); SRI MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R2 AND R3 ; SRI S.N. PRASHANTH CHANDRA, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE ORDER SATED 06/07/2022 IN M.A.G.(1) /170/2021 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 06.07.2022 in M.A.G(1)/170 of 2021 passed by respondent No.3 produce at Annexure-A. 3. Respondent No.1 has filed the memo reporting the death of the respondent No.1-Raziya Begum on 14.01.2023. In view of this development, and considering that respondent No.1 was contesting respondent as well as the beneficiary of - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46233 WP No. 18647 of 2022 the maintenance order, the cause of action in the present writ petition no longer survives. The direction issued by respondent No.3 pertaining to payment of maintenance to respondent No.1; with her demise, as the relief sought in the petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7