HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 31114 of 2025 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJ BEER SINGH, J. 1. Sri Sonu Kumar Upadhyay, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State. 3. This application under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as BNSS) has been filed for quashing of entire proceedings, including charge-sheet dated 22.09.2016, of Case No. 6182 of 2016 (State Vs. Deepal Alan and others), arising out of Case Crime No.220 of 2015, under Sections 147, 323, 504, 452, 427, 506 IPC, P.S.- Sadar Bazar, District- Meerut, pending in the court of C.J.M., Meerut, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 4. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicants that the alleged dispute between the parties has taken place due to misconception and that now both the parties have amicably settled the dispute and the informant / injured does not want to pursue the impugned proceedings. In the alleged incident, informant / injured has not sustained any serious injury. In pursuance to order dated 01.05.2025, passed by this Court, both the parties have filed compromise before the trial Court, which has duly been verified vide order dated 01.07.2025, the certified copy of the same is available on record. It was submitted that in view of aforesaid facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 has concurred with the arguments of learned counsel for the applicants and submitted that both the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Uma Nath Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Deepak Alan @ Sardendra Alan And 8 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) parties have amicably settled the dispute and compromised the matter and the informant / injured does not want to proceed with the case pending before the trial court and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed. 6. Learned A.G.A. has no objection if parties compromise the matter. 7. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 8. It is well settled that in appropriate cases criminal proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise between the parties, by invoking inherent powers enshrined under Section 528 BNSS. In the instant case, the matter relates to private dispute between the parties. If parties compromise the matter, it would not have adverse impact on society. The informant / injured does not want to pursue the impugned proceedings. The compromise filed by the parties before the trial court, has already been verified by the court concerned. Considering aforesaid facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed. 9. In view of the aforesaid, entire impugned proceedings, including charge- sheet, of the aforesaid case against applicants, namely, Deepak Alan @ Sardendra Alan, Anshul Alan, Antul Alan, Sanjay Maheshwari, Alok Goyal, Vikas Goyal, Smt. Rakhi Sharma, Priyanshu Manglik & Smt. Geeta Thakur are hereby quashed. 10. The application u/s 528 BNSS is allowed. September 12, 2025 'SP'/- NA528 No. 31114 of 2025 2 (Raj Beer Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad