CHANDA YADAV v. SRI VIKRANT VEER, SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AND ANOTHER
CAPL/4654/2025 · 2025-10-06
Dinesh Pathak
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 88545 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 88545 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4654 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J.
1. Respondents No. 1 and 2 have filed compliance affidavit today in Court, which is taken on record. Office is directed to proceed accordingly.
2. Learned Standing Counsel representing the respondents No. 1 and 2 states that the FIR has been lodged and no cause of action for the present contempt application survives, therefore, instant application may be dismissed as infructuous.
3. In this view of the matter, instant contempt application is dismissed as having become infructuous. October 7, 2025 vinay Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Farhan Khan, Rehan Akhtar Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Chanda Yadav .....Applicant(s) Sri Vikrant Veer, Superintendent Of Police And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad