Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:55764 Court No. - 84 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 27793 of 2024 Applicant :- Vikas Chandra Shukla @ Vikki And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Jitendra Kumar Mishra,Lok Nath Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Prem Shankar Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Supplementary affidavit, filed today, is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants; learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the charge sheet dated 26.01.2016 as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.10187 of 2016 (State Versus Vikas Chandra Shukla @ Vikki and another) arising out of Case Crime No. 427 of 2015, under Sections 323/504/506/452 I.P.C., in Police Station- Meja, District-Allahabad, pending in the Court of A.C.J.M., 10, Allahabad on the basis of compromised dated 22.07.2022. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably settled the dispute out of the Court. The Co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 31.08.2024 directed the parties to appear before the court below and file the certified copy of compromise deed. 5. Pursuant to the said order dated 31.08.2024, the parties appeared before the court below and in their presence, after due verification of the contents of the compromise made between the parties, order dated 12.09.2024 has been passed by the court verifying the said compromise. A copy of the same is annexed as Annexure- S.A.-1 to the supplementary affidavit. 6. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant and opposite party no.2 have settled their private and civil dispute through compromise and as such opposite party no.2 does not wish to press the aforesaid case against the applicant. Opposite party no.2 is ready to withdraw the prosecution of the applicants and in view of the compromise, no fruitful purpose would be served if the prosecution is allowed to go on. 7. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.2 does not dispute the correctness of the submission made by learned counsel for the applicants or the correctness of the documents relied upon by him. He submits that opposite party no. 2 has no objection, if the proceedings in the aforesaid case are quashed. 8. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the applicants and opposite party no. 2 do not want to pursue the case any further as stated by them. The matter has been mutually settled between the parties, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 9. Thus in view of the well settled principle of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matters of Krishnappa & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka; 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 529, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Ors. vs. State of Gujarat and another; 2017 9 SCC 641, B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana; 2003(4) SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Burea of Investigation and another; (2008) 9 Supreme Court Cases 677, Gian Singh Vs. Stated of Punjab; (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab and another; (2014) Supreme Today 642, the proceedings of Criminal Case No.10187 of 2016 (State Versus Vikas Chandra Shukla @ Vikki and another) arising out of Case Crime No. 427 of 2015, under Sections 323/504/506/452 I.P.C., in Police Station- Meja, District-Allahabad, is hereby quashed. 10. This application under Section 482 CrPC is accordingly allowed. Order Date :- 16.4.2025 Meenu Singh Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad