SRI BHAGWAN BHAJNASHRAM VRINDAVAN v. NAGAR NIGAM MATHURA
A227/9451/2025 · 2025-08-21
Manish Kumar Nigam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 88514 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 88514 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:144444 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 9451 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sri Bhagwan Bhajnashram Vrindavan Respondent :- Nagar Nigam Mathura Counsel for Petitioner :- Chhaya Gupta,Sujeet Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Sahab Tiwari Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Supplementary affidavit file today is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
3. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief:
"direct the learned court below to decide the interim injunction application dated 23.7.2025 filed in Civil Suit No.448 of 2025, pending before Civil Judge (Senior Division), Mathura."
4. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction is pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
5. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
6. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.) Mathura to consider and decide the interim injunction application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 22.8.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad